Franz Kafka and His Father Relationship | Essay Writing Service A+
Throughout The Metamorphosis, Kafka illustrates the relationship between Gregor “His studies and professional life seemed an effort to win his father's elusive. Which two statements **BEST** exemplify the deterioration of Gregor' relationship with his father over the course of the narrative?. "He gathered up a big newspaper from the table and, stamping his feet, began to drive Gregor back into his room by brandishing the walking.
The letter, which he gave to his mother to pass on, never reached its addressee. The letter tells of the reprimand he received for irritating his father one night, by relentlessly asking for a drink of water. His father locked him out of the house for a short time.
Kafka directly attacks one of the most important people in his life, knowing that in doing so he is also attacking himself with shame. It is an explanation of the dramatic changes that had taken place throughout his life symbolic of his own life and nightmare-like life experiences he had with his father. Franz Kafka is greatly known for unfolding bizarre situations with simple, cold words. Kafka did not try to surprise readers with detailed descriptions of ghastly scenes; instead, Kafka preferred blunt absurdity.
Consider the plain bluntness of the first sentence: With the opening of the story, we meet Gregor, a young commercial traveler. When Gregor opens his eyes, he finds himself changed into a grotesque vermin or an enormous insect, an insignificant creature. Gregor does not scream.
It seems as though Gregor accepts his fate so willingly. With this striking opening, Kafka sets his mystifying psychological fantasy in motion. Kafka lived a sad life.
He was persistently haunted by the oppressive image of his father.
But, since his door was locked, he would need to call for help, which he does not favor. He would rather lay on the bed forever than call his father to help him. Kafka lived in the shadow of his dominating father under continuous pressure to take over the family business. Hermann always viewed Franz as a failure and disapproved of his writing. Before the metamorphosis of Gregor, he used to work and support the entire family. However, after the metamorphosis, he was completely unnoticed and was never given any significance.
He was left alone in a room for dead. His family never acknowledged his efforts in supporting the family, and never considered what he may want or need. Even the end of the story is not just the usual end as may be predictable.
It is quite apparent in more ways than one that he was writing a twisted story of his life. The emotional and physical abuse Gregor goes through are similar to what Kafka went through in real life.
They were both abused and neglected by their fathers when they were disappointed with them. Kafka uses Gregor transforming into a bug as a way of amplifying himself, trying to express his feelings and point of view.
Gregor was an example of this because he could not leave the house to escape the noises and abuse. Essentially, Georg had mailed three letters beforehand telling his friend about wedding plans of an insignificant couple from town. Before sending out the letter, Georg checks on his father, a man who once was imposing but now ill and senile. The story then becomes a recounting of the last conversation between father and son.
The expectation would be that for an individual to have turned into a beetle in the space of one night there is every reason to ask oneself how such a dramatic transformation could have possibly occurred. As such, the reader is left wondering if at all Gregor underwent any physical change. Even as the presentation of the story is such that mutation appears more of a fact, nevertheless, one could as well infer that the story is more of a metaphor seeking to depict the household of Samsa and its state.
Before Gregor underwent the transformation process, his life was rather boring. Coincidently, this boring life bears a close correlation with that led by such an insect as a beetle.
Gregor was fully occupied with his work and was determined to ensure that remained a god provider of his family. Gregor neither had a hobby, nor did he have close friends. Even within the family, the only person that he had a close relationship with was her sister.
As such, Gregor may be seen as a complete departure from what one would expect of a normal human being. Once he becomes aware of his responsibility at the household level and upon a realization of his p current plight, this is the time that the actual metamorphosis takes place. However, this idea is in contrast to classical sentiments which consider children as entirely innocent Rohl This unusual view of himself was fostered by the nonsensical treatment from his father.
In his letter to his father, Kafka says that he was skinny, weakly whereas his father was strong, tall and huge.
Comparison Of The Father And Son Relationship In Metamorphosis And Oedipus The King
In this regard, Kaka viewed himself as a bug; something that could be easily grabbed and manipulated. Kafka shows that his father was superior in almost all aspects; physical strength, ability to command, and also in the innate power over the world that Kafka also thought he had. This influenced the writer in many ways. The picture frame of how Gregor holds on to the things that appeal to him loudly echoes to the reader the inadequacy that Kafka felt due to his relationship with his father Mitchell At the opening of the play, Oedipus has excellent qualities that enable him, as a ruler, to determine the needs of his subjects.
His fame and powers came as a result of resolving the Sphinx riddle. After the terrible plague befalls his kingdom, Creon, the brother to the Queen comes from Thebe oracles and warns that the person who murdered the old king, Laius has to be revealed first before the plague could be lifted.
Due to his dedication to protect his people, the king is determined to reveal the root of the problem Stewart par. The writer shows that Oedipus has the potential of acting harshly Stewart par. As demonstrated in Metamorphosis, the tragedy of the son is an illustration of punishment that has no fault. Oedipus was abandoned by his parents whereas Gregor, who represents Kafka, was brought up by his parents. Oedipus was acting out of unknown urge to kill his father, a situation that resulted in total destruction within the family.
After his birth, Oedipus was to kill his father and later marry his mother, as it had been foretold.
In this regard, his father orders that his son be dumped in the wilderness. Oedipus was adopted by another royal family who do not reveal to him about his background. When he had about the prophecy, he ran away to avoid the predicament. But on the way, he met his true father who overtakes him in traffic. After a heated argument, Oedipus kills the man without knowing it was his father. Later on he becomes the king and unknowingly marries his mother and they both have children.
When the mother discovers, he kills herself while Oedipus goes into exile Stewart par. In the metamorphosis, Kakfa was fighting with the alienation that he felt by not being a Czech or a German. More so he was the only son in a family of three siblings. This increased the pressure that he encountered from his family who expected him to behave in certain ways Rohl This same case applied to Gregor in The Metaphor story where Gregor is shown as the eldest child and the only son.
His father made him provide for his family yet the members were capable of finding food for themselves as it is seen as the story progresses. This is a form of punishment without any fault Mitchell 9 More so, like in Metamorphosis, the tragedy that befell Oedipus depicts a strange and contrasting father —son relationship. In this story, although every father needs a successor, in this play, the father wants to kill his child at birth.
This is a fate that is unchangeable by human.